Write a 640 word count and compare the issues that Mississippi has as relates to assessment and curriculum in the classroom in reading for students. Also, reflect on What is meant by “teaching to the test”? Why does this have such a negative connotation in the schools? Include a peer review article as it relates to curriculum Common Core Standards, and the Foundations of Reading.
References
Afflerbach, P. (Ed.). (2010). Essential readings on assessment. Newark, DE: International Reading Association.
Allington, R. L. (2005). What really matters for struggling readers: Designing research-based programs (2nd ed.). Boston, MA: Allyn & Bacon.
Allington, R. L., & Walmsley, S. A. (2007). No quick fix, the RTI edition: Rethinking literacy programs in America’s elementary schools. New York, NY: Teachers College Press.
Athans, S. K., & Devine, D. A. (2010). Fun-tastic activities for differentiating comprehension instruction, grades 2-6. Newark, DE: International Reading Association.
Blythe, T., Allen, D., & Powell, B. S. (2007). Looking together at student work (2nd ed.). New York, NY: Teachers College Press.
Fuchs, D., Fuchs, L. S., & Vaughn, S. (Eds.). (2008). Response to intervention: A framework for reading educators. Newark, DE: International Reading Association.
International Reading Association and National Council of Teachers of English. (2010). Standards for the assessment of reading and writing. Newark, DE: author.
Israel, S. E. (2007). Using metacognitive assessments to create individualized reading instruction. Newark, DE: International Reading Association.
Jensen, E. (2005). Teaching with the brain in mind (2nd ed.). Alexandria, VA: Association for Supervision and Curriculum Development.
Scanlon, D. M., Anderson, Kimberly L. (2010). Using the interactive strategies approach to prevent reading difficulties in an RTI context. In M. Y. Lipson & K. K. Wixon (Eds.), Successful approaches to RTI: Collaborative practices for improving K-12 literacy.
Newark, DE: International Reading Association.
Spear-Swerling, L., & Sternberg, R. J. (1994). The road not taken: An integrative theoretical model of reading disability. Journal of Learning Disabilities, 27(2), 91-103, 122.
Valencia, S. W., & Buly, M. R. (2004). Behind test scores: What struggling readers really need. The Reading Teacher, 57(6), 520-531.
Delivering a high-quality product at a reasonable price is not enough anymore.
That’s why we have developed 5 beneficial guarantees that will make your experience with our service enjoyable, easy, and safe.
You have to be 100% sure of the quality of your product to give a money-back guarantee. This describes us perfectly. Make sure that this guarantee is totally transparent.
Read moreEach paper is composed from scratch, according to your instructions. It is then checked by our plagiarism-detection software. There is no gap where plagiarism could squeeze in.
Read moreThanks to our free revisions, there is no way for you to be unsatisfied. We will work on your paper until you are completely happy with the result.
Read moreYour email is safe, as we store it according to international data protection rules. Your bank details are secure, as we use only reliable payment systems.
Read moreBy sending us your money, you buy the service we provide. Check out our terms and conditions if you prefer business talks to be laid out in official language.
Read more