Description: Choose another qualitative data source, such as observation, questionnaire (open-ended or both open- and closed-ended), survey, narratives, archival documents, and review the required texts as well as other sources to learn more about that data source. Then find a dissertation or study that uses that data source within their study; try to find one that includes the instrument for the data source. For observations and archival documents, the study may include a checklist and/or rubric to use in conducting those procedures however the observation and documents collected are considered data sources. Provide an overview of the data source – what it is, what purposes it is used for, and how it’s appropriate for the dissertation study you found. Within your discussion include support from the literature. Then discuss how the data source could be used for your own study. Develop an instrument (questionnaire, survey, checklist or rubric) to use as or for the data source. Refer to the selected dissertation or study and other sources to help in your development A minimum of one page is required for the data source overview. A minimum of one page is required for instrument development and discussion specific to own study.
Total Possible Score: 10.00
Total: 2.00
Thoroughly identified an instrument for an data source from a dissertation or study
Fully identified an instrument for an data source from a dissertation or study
Identified an instrument for an data source from a dissertation or study
Incompletely identified an instrument for an data source from a dissertation or study
Does not identify an instrument for an data source from a dissertation or study
Total: 2.00
Provided a thorough overview of the data source, including what it is, what purposes it is used for, and how it’s appropriate for the dissertation study located
Provided a detailed overview of the data source, including what it is, what purposes it is used for, and how it’s appropriate for the dissertation study located
Provided an overview of the data source, including what it is, what purposes it is used for, and how it’s appropriate for the dissertation study located
Provided an incomplete overview of the data source, including aspects of what it is, what purposes it is used for, and how it’s appropriate for the dissertation study located
Did not provide an overview of the data source
Total: 2.00
Developed a thorough instrument (questionnaire, survey, checklist or rubric) to use as or for the data source
Developed a detailed instrument (questionnaire, survey, checklist or rubric) to use as or for the data source
Developed an instrument (questionnaire, survey, checklist or rubric) to use as or for the data source
Developed an insufficient instrument (questionnaire, survey, checklist or rubric) to use as or for the data source
Did not develop an instrument (questionnaire, survey, checklist or rubric) to use as or for the data source
Total: 2.00
5 – Demonstrates exemplary critical analysis of the research materials. The student comprehensively uses varied, scholarly, relevant, and current resources to inform analysis, evaluation, problem-solving, and decision-making.
4 – Demonstrates effective critical analysis of the research materials. The student fully uses varied, scholarly, relevant, and current resources to inform analysis, evaluation, problem-solving, and decision-making.
3 – Demonstrates adequate critical analysis of the research materials. The student adequately uses varied, scholarly, relevant, and current resources to inform analysis, evaluation, problem-solving, and decision-making.
2 – Demonstrates some critical analysis of the research materials. The student partially uses varied, scholarly, relevant, and current resources to inform analysis, evaluation, problem-solving, and decision-making.
1 – Lacking critical analysis of the research materials. The student fails to use varied, scholarly, relevant, and current resources to inform analysis, evaluation, problem-solving, and decision-making.
Total: 2.00
5 – Demonstrates exemplary clarity and organization. The paper contains a well-articulated thesis statement, flawless mechanics, and precise APA formatting.
4 – Demonstrates effective clarity and organization. The paper contains a well-articulated thesis statement, proper mechanics, and correct APA formatting.
3 – Demonstrates adequate clarity and organization. The paper contains a clear thesis statement, adequate mechanics, and mostly correct APA formatting.
2 – Demonstrates some clarity and organization. The paper contains an unclear thesis statement, poor mechanics, and improper APA formatting.
1 – Lacking clarity and organization. The paper lacks a thesis statement, effective mechanics, and proper APA formatting.
Delivering a high-quality product at a reasonable price is not enough anymore.
That’s why we have developed 5 beneficial guarantees that will make your experience with our service enjoyable, easy, and safe.
You have to be 100% sure of the quality of your product to give a money-back guarantee. This describes us perfectly. Make sure that this guarantee is totally transparent.
Read moreEach paper is composed from scratch, according to your instructions. It is then checked by our plagiarism-detection software. There is no gap where plagiarism could squeeze in.
Read moreThanks to our free revisions, there is no way for you to be unsatisfied. We will work on your paper until you are completely happy with the result.
Read moreYour email is safe, as we store it according to international data protection rules. Your bank details are secure, as we use only reliable payment systems.
Read moreBy sending us your money, you buy the service we provide. Check out our terms and conditions if you prefer business talks to be laid out in official language.
Read more