In the given case, an audit is to be conducted for one of the small client named Chartreuse Enterprises and hence the audit partner of the company has requested the audit assistant to prepare an audit plan for the same based on the trial balance of the client given below. The Trail balance is to be studied and the significant audit accounts which need immediate attention and checking needs to be highlighted. In the report below, the materiality to be taken for the audit of the client has been revisited and calculated (Goldmann, 2016). The preliminary analytical review of the company has been done and trend analysis has been done to find out the risk of material misstatement and a brief justification has been provided as to why these accounts are eligible for audit testing. The audit procedure that would be required in each of the above cases to find out audit evidences has also been mentioned. Finally, the fraud risk analysis of the client has been done based on the analytical review.
The trail balance of the client, Chartreuse Enterprises has been shown below:
Chartreuse Enterprises |
||||||
Trial Balance |
||||||
Particulars |
Jul 1, 2016 – Apr 30, 2017 |
Jul 1, 2015 – June 30, 2016 |
||||
Debit |
Credit |
Debit |
Credit |
|||
Cash at Bank |
85,000 |
80,000 |
||||
Accounts receivable |
118,340 |
111,000 |
||||
Inventory |
187,500 |
174,000 |
||||
Machinery |
71,000 |
65,000 |
||||
Accumulated Depreciation |
30,959 |
24,375 |
||||
Motor Vehicles |
66,000 |
66,000 |
||||
Accumulated Depreciation |
27,308 |
21,000 |
||||
Furniture |
7,400 |
7,400 |
||||
Accumulated Depreciation |
2,820 |
2,220 |
||||
Bank Loan |
230,000 |
230,000 |
||||
Sales |
157,500 |
187,450 |
||||
Cost of sales |
57,917 |
63,595 |
||||
Consultancy fees |
49,375 |
57,000 |
||||
Interest income |
40 |
50 |
||||
Bank charges |
290 |
350 |
||||
Depreciation |
13,492 |
15,863 |
||||
Interest expense |
9,583 |
11,500 |
||||
Printing |
210 |
250 |
||||
Repairs and Maintenance |
1,200 |
5,050 |
||||
Wages |
40,000 |
53,000 |
||||
Superannuation |
2,967 |
4,770 |
||||
Total |
660,898 |
498,002 |
657,778 |
522,095 |
||
Materiality is something, which is very important and critical from the auditor’s perspective. Some information, misstatement, error or omission is said to be material in individual or in aggregation if the same has the capability or the ability to change the economic decision of the user(Belton, 2017). It serves a very important purpose in the audit as it helps in classifying what is material and what is not, thereby helping the auditor in focusing in critical and significant areas only. In the case of the given company, the preliminary materiality level has been set at $15000, which is very high considering the financials of the company (Islam & Islam, 2011). The IASB as well as the accounting board and firms have prescribed and set many norms for the determination of the materiality limits, which has been explained below with the example. The materiality limits can be in the range of 0.5-1% of gross revenue, 1-2% of the total assets or the gross profit, 5-10% of the net profit, 2-5% of the shareholder’s return, etc. The materiality level as per the below working should be in the range of $787.5 to $157 as if any other limit is being chosen, lot of material accounts would be missed out in the process and from the ambit of the audit (Werner, 2017). Considering the given materiality limit, the accounts, which would not be ignored, is the interest expenses, superannuation account, repairs and maintenance, depreciation, etc.
(in $) |
|||
Chartreuse Enterprises |
|||
Quantitative estimate of materiality |
|||
Criterion |
Base |
Amount |
Materiality level/range |
0.5% to 1% of gross revenue |
Gross Revenue |
157,500.00 |
787.5 to 1575 |
1% to 2% of the total assets |
Total Assets |
474,152.93 |
4741.53 to 9483.06 |
1% to 2% of the gross profit |
Gross Profit |
59,583.33 |
595.83 to 1191.67 |
2% – 5% of the shareholders’ equity |
Equity |
NA |
NA |
5% to 10% of the net profit |
Net profit |
81,256.67 |
406.28 to 812.57 |
The analytical review has been done in the form of the trend analysis and the preparation of the common size balance sheet for the years 2017 and 2016. Each of the line items of the profit and loss account has been represented as a percentage of the sales(Trieu, 2017).
Chartreuse Enterprises |
||||
Income Statement |
||||
Particulars |
2,017 |
% of sales |
2,016 |
% of sales |
Sales |
157,500 |
76.1% |
187,450 |
76.7% |
Consultancy fees |
49,375 |
23.9% |
57,000 |
23.3% |
Interest income |
40 |
0.0% |
50 |
0.0% |
Total Revenue |
206,915 |
100.0% |
244,500 |
100.0% |
Less: Expenses |
||||
Cost of sales |
57,917 |
28.0% |
63,595 |
26.0% |
Bank charges |
290 |
0.1% |
350 |
0.1% |
Depreciation |
13,492 |
6.5% |
15,863 |
6.5% |
Interest expense |
9,583 |
4.6% |
11,500 |
4.7% |
Printing |
210 |
0.1% |
250 |
0.1% |
Repairs and Maintenance |
1,200 |
0.6% |
5,050 |
2.1% |
Wages |
40,000 |
19.3% |
53,000 |
21.7% |
Superannuation |
2,967 |
1.4% |
4,770 |
2.0% |
Total Expenses |
125,658 |
60.7% |
154,378 |
63.1% |
Net Profit |
81,257 |
39.3% |
90,122 |
36.9% |
Chartreuse Enterprises |
|||
Income Statement |
|||
Particulars |
2,017 |
2,016 |
Variance |
Sales |
157,500 |
187,450 |
– 29,950 |
Consultancy fees |
49,375 |
57,000 |
– 7,625 |
Interest income |
40 |
50 |
– 10 |
Total Revenue |
206,915 |
244,500 |
– 37,585 |
Less: Expenses |
|||
Cost of sales |
57,917 |
63,595 |
– 5,678 |
Bank charges |
290 |
350 |
– 60 |
Depreciation |
13,492 |
15,863 |
– 2,372 |
Interest expense |
9,583 |
11,500 |
– 1,917 |
Printing |
210 |
250 |
– 40 |
Repairs and Maintenance |
1,200 |
5,050 |
– 3,850 |
Wages |
40,000 |
53,000 |
– 13,000 |
Superannuation |
2,967 |
4,770 |
– 1,803 |
Total Expenses |
125,658 |
154,378 |
– 28,720 |
Net Profit |
81,257 |
90,122 |
– 8,865 |
Net Profit % |
0 |
0 |
0 |
As per the trend analysis above, we can see a number of accounts which are at risk in the given trail balance and there is a risk of material misstatement in a few of them and thus they need significant audit attention.
Sl. No. |
Account Name |
Audit Assertion and risk |
1. |
Sales |
The overall revenue has declined by 15.37% and the direct sales has declined by 15.98%. The net profit has also been on the lower side as compared to the last year by 9.84% and it needs to be checked if it is due to the fall in prices or fall in quantity or it is due to the some other external reasons. In terms of the common size statement, the sales percentage has been more or less same (Saeidi, 2012). |
2. |
Depreciation expenses |
It can be seen that the percentage of depreciation expenses has remained 6.5% of revenue in each of the years. Furthermore, it has declined by almost 15% as compared to the last year. Being a fixed expense, it should not have gone down so estimations and judgement of the management in this regard, the useful lives, etc. needs to be checked. It also needs to be seen if the company or management has made any major acquisition or disposal of the assets (Jefferson, 2017). |
3 |
Wages |
Wages being a direct expenses, was expected to decrease in the proportion of the sales whereas in the given case, the same has fallen by around 24.53% and in case, the expense is measured as a percentage of the overall sales for the year, it is seen that it was 21.7% of sales in 2016 and dropped to 19.3% in 2017. It needs to be checked if the number of labour resources have been cut or the wages have been declined (Sithole, et al., 2017). |
The audit assertions for each of the given accounts has been explained in detail in the above question. Now the audit procedures to be employed for checking each of these accounts are shown below:
Sales: Here pareto analysis can be employed to do the audit of sales, vouching of the invoices should be done, besides the prices and the quantity sold for both the years needs to be checked(Knechel & Salterio, 2016). The top contributing part number or the products can be considered for the audit purposes and it needs to be checked if the revenue recognition policy and standards have been adhered to.
Depreciation: Careful scrutiny needs to be done by the audit team in this regard. It needs to be checked if the acquisitions or disposals have been done during the year and is there a change in the method of depreciation or the rate of depreciation(Raiborn, et al., 2016). The auditor should also check if the proper accounting standard has been used for accounting of the depreciation expenses and if the management has conducted physical verification of assets during the year.
Wages: Since wages is direct expenses, it should have fallen in proportion of the sales but it has fallen more in proportion of the sales and therefore it needs to be checked if the number of labourers has been reduced or the wage per hour has been reduced(Bizfluent, 2017). It also needs to be checked if the Minimum Wages Act has been adhered too and if the company is giving adequate security to its labourers.
Conclusion & Recommendation
These are few of the major fraud risk factors, which needs to be examined and audited.
References
Belton, P., 2017. Competitive Strategy: Creating and Sustaining Superior Performance. London: Macat International ltd.
Bizfluent, 2017. Advantages & Disadvantages of Internal Control. [Online]
Available at: https://bizfluent.com/info-8064250-advantages-disadvantages-internal-control.html
[Accessed 13 September 2018].
Choy, Y. K., 2018. Cost-benefit Analysis, Values, Wellbeing and Ethics: An Indigenous Worldview Analysis. Ecological Economics, p. 145.
Dichev, I., 2017. On the conceptual foundations of financial reporting. Accounting and Business Research, 47(6), pp. 617-632.
Goldmann, K., 2016. Financial Liquidity and Profitability Management in Practice of Polish Business. Financial Environment and Business Development, 4(3), pp. 103-112.
Islam, M. A. & Islam, M. A., 2011. Environmental incidents in a developing country and corporate environmental disclosures: A study of a multinational gas company. Society and Business Review, 6(3), pp. 229-248.
Jefferson, M., 2017. Energy, Complexity and Wealth Maximization, R. Ayres. Springer, Switzerland. Technological Forecasting and Social Change, pp. 353-354.
Knechel, W. & Salterio, S., 2016. Auditing:Assurance and Risk. fourth ed. New York: Routledge.
Linden, B. & Freeman, R., 2017. Profit and Other Values: Thick Evaluation in Decision Making. Business Ethics Quarterly, 27(3), pp. 353-379.
Raiborn, C., Butler, J. & Martin, K., 2016. The internal audit function: A prerequisite for Good Governance. Journal of Corporate Accounting and Finance, 28(2), pp. 10-21.
Saeidi, F., 2012. Audit expectations gap and corporate fraud: Empirical evidence from Iran. African Journal of Business Management, 6(23), pp. 7031-41.
Sithole, S., Chandler, P., Abeysekera, I. & Paas, F., 2017. Benefits of guided self-management of attention on learning accounting. Journal of Educational Psychology, 109(2), p. 220.
Trieu, V., 2017. Getting value from Business Intelligence systems: A review and research agenda. Decision Support Systems, Volume 93, pp. 111-124.
Werner, M., 2017. Financial process mining – Accounting data structure dependent control flow inference. International Journal of Accounting Information Systems, Volume 25, pp. 57-80.
Delivering a high-quality product at a reasonable price is not enough anymore.
That’s why we have developed 5 beneficial guarantees that will make your experience with our service enjoyable, easy, and safe.
You have to be 100% sure of the quality of your product to give a money-back guarantee. This describes us perfectly. Make sure that this guarantee is totally transparent.
Read moreEach paper is composed from scratch, according to your instructions. It is then checked by our plagiarism-detection software. There is no gap where plagiarism could squeeze in.
Read moreThanks to our free revisions, there is no way for you to be unsatisfied. We will work on your paper until you are completely happy with the result.
Read moreYour email is safe, as we store it according to international data protection rules. Your bank details are secure, as we use only reliable payment systems.
Read moreBy sending us your money, you buy the service we provide. Check out our terms and conditions if you prefer business talks to be laid out in official language.
Read more