Seminar in groups and Teams

Instructions
For this course, you will have a course project that includes the written assignments in Weeks 1, 3, and 5. The Week 3 and Week 5 assignments are considered major assignments, which combined are worth almost half of the total course points. It will likely take you more than one week to complete the Week 3 and 5 major assignments, so begin working on those tasks sooner rather than later.
Summary of the weekly deliverables:

Week 1: Identify a subject organization. Provide an initial assessment of some problem related to teams or to a specific team in the organization, utilizing relevant group and team behavior themes. Provide an annotated reference list of at least five peer-reviewed resources that can help you better understand the team’s themes and assess the organizational problem.
Week 3: On the basis of your Week 1 work, observations, interviews, and/or additional research, present a paper assessing the root causes of the organizational problem by using team behavior themes.
Week 5: On the basis of your Week 1 and Week 3 work, justify an action plan based on strong research. What are the consequences to the organization for failing to act? What are the benefits of addressing the problem? What are the recommended action steps for the organization?

Note: The course project for MGT7105 shares similar processes and deliverables to MGT7100. However, the project in MGT7100 asked you to conduct your organizational diagnosis through the lens of individual organizational behavior themes. In contrast, the MGT7105 project asks you to conduct your analysis through the lens of team behavior themes. Being able to operate at different levels of analysis (such as the individual level, team level, and organizational level) is an important skill for the organizational behavior expert.
For Week 1:
Tasks:
Locate a suitable subject organization for your course project. The organization can be your current organization or one that you are familiar with. Students who select their own organizations to study are more prone to bias and are tempted to solve tactical problems they encounter on a daily basis. For the course project, maintain focus on the specific assignment (related to team behavior) and your Doctor of Business Administration (DBA) program (Organizational Behavior). Contact your instructor early in the week if you need assistance selecting an organization. For your paper, provide a summary of the organization. Include the following details in your summary:

What is the organization?
What does it do?
Who does it do it to/for?
In what way does the organization utilize groups or teams?

In organizational diagnosis, one of the first steps is an initial assessment of potential areas of concern. If you were contracting with an organization as a consultant, the chief executive officer (CEO) would likely share in the early conversations about why you are being hired. As part of the process, you would make observations, look at some organizational documents, and even have some informal conversations with organizational members to get a sense of where issues might be located so that you can determine how you will gather necessary data for diagnosing problems and recommending solutions.
In your paper, provide an initial assessment of some organizational problems that are evident in your case study organization. Although in an actual consulting scenario, you would do your assessment on the basis of your full range of organizational and leadership theory knowledge, for this course project, focus on group and team behavior dynamics.

What are the symptoms of the problems?
What is the evidence that problems actually exist?
What are the relevant group and team themes that might explain the problems (and not just the symptoms)?

Remember, helpful questions about teams include:

Why does the team do what it does?
Is the team functioning effectively and what factors are influencing effectiveness?

How do we enhance team performance to achieve organizational goals? On the basis of your initial assessment, one of the first things you will need to do is determine the additional information required for fully assessing the situation. In other words, what resources do you need to better understand the themes and assess the organizational difficulty? For your paper, provide an annotated reference list of at least five peer-reviewed sources that are relevant to your case study. Most of the references should relate to team behavior or team topics. However, at least one resource must relate to methodology (such as how to do organizational diagnosis or how to conduct a survey). Your methodology resource should be different than the resource you used in the Week 1 Project during the Organizational Behavior course. By selecting a different resource, you will build a larger portfolio of resources through your doctoral program.
An annotated reference list means that each reference is followed by a brief (usually about 150 words) descriptive and evaluative paragraph. The purpose of the annotation is to inform the reader of the relevance, accuracy, and quality of the sources cited. Annotations are descriptive and critical; they expose the author’s point of view and authority. Remember, for APA, every reference must have at least one corresponding in-text citation. For this paper, the annotated reference list is your reference list, and entries need to be part of your research and support in the paper.
Submission Details:

Complete your analysis in a 5- to 6-page Microsoft Word document, using APA style.