reading assignment BASED on the attached files

  
1-You are reviewing proposals submitted for the “Lambert Park Phase 2” project. Using the RFP evaluate 2 of the 4 proposals and score them on the evaluation sheet provided (separate excel file, ignore cost for this assignment).
 
                                                                                                        Co#1                                       Co#2
Criteria                                                                max         score     commets      score     commets
                                                                                  points      Co#1        Co#1           Co#2         Co#2 
 
     
Expertise, Experience & Training              25
Plus Prior Contracting History(25%) 
The expertise, experience and 
training of the proposer and its key
 personnel and previous experience 
with similar work in similar fields and
 qualifications and depth of the staff 
that will performthe work on this   
project.  This factor includes evaluation
of the proposer’s prior contracting history
, including the review of the proposer’s 
certifications relating to false claims,
debarment and civil litigation.

 Project Approach (40%) – The                    40
proposer’s responsiveness in developing
 a comprehensive plan while meeting 
regulatory requirements and 
the City’s specific needs 

Schedule (10%) – Proposal for              10
completing the project in a timely
manner, inclusive of the proposer’s
ability to identify critical paths for 
the timely and competent completion
of all work contemplated under the RFP. 

Compliance with RFP (10%) – The ability of      10
the proposer to comply with all instructions
set forth under this RFP as well as the proposer’s
 ability to agree to all of the terms and conditions
 of the attached PSA without modification,
 particularly as relates to indemnification, 
insurance requirements and standards of care. 

     
Cost (15%) – The proposed compensation       15
structure (inclusive of   hourly rates of 
compensation, pass through costs and 
subconsultant costs) for   the performance of
 Tasks 1 through 8, inclusive of its proposed not-to
 -exceed sum.  The proposers proposed strategy for
 containing costs   incurred by City while still meeting
 the objectives and standards set forth   under the RFP.
 

  
2. Risk Management Case Study – ANMC
Part A: Evaluate the risks associated with completing this project by using a risk matrix. Identify at least 6 important threats, define your probability and cost scales, evaluate the risks and list the threats in order from highest to lowest risk.
Part B: Of the risks you identified, which risks should you mitigate? What steps could you take to manage and/or mitigate the risks you identified 
 
 Risk Analysis & Risk Management: Evaluating and Managing the Risks You Face, http://www.mindtools.com/pages/article/newTMC_07.htm 

Risk Management Toolkit From Systems Engineering Program Office, MITRE Corp. http://www.mitre.org/work/sepo/toolkits/risk/index.html