Discussion: Unit 6, Due Wednesday by 11:59 pm CT
Palliative Care
Instructions:
Please complete the following steps for your discussion post and response.
Reference below article to aid in forming your discussion:
Norman, K. (2016). Live and let die: The consequences of Oklahoma’s nondiscrimination in treatment act. Oklahoma Law Review 68(3). Retrieved from https://digitalcommons.law.ou.edu/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?referer=https://www.google.com/&httpsredir=1&article=1028&context=olr
Glenn Ross, a 55-year-old man living in Oklahoma, was diagnosed with inoperable pancreatic cancer. His prognosis was poor; he was given about six months to live. He underwent several series of chemotherapy treatments, but they were of no benefit. He continued to lose weight, suffered from nausea, and became weaker. After three months of chemotherapy treatments, he stated that he wanted no further treatment. He became bedridden and was admitted into a nursing home for terminal care. Glenn’s son, who lived in another state, arrived at the nursing home and demanded that his father’s physician be called immediately. The son wanted his father to be hospitalized and placed on chemotherapy immediately. When the physician explained that there was little hope for the father’s recovery, the son threatened to sue the physician for withdrawal of care.
As the manager of Glenn’s palliative care facility, you are responsible for helping Glenn’s physician navigate the appropriate legal and ethical course of action. Answer the following questions in your discussion post:
Identify the ethical issues in the scenario described.
Does the son have a legitimate reason to sue the physician? Why or why not? Support your opinion with research and cite relevant laws and regulations that support or discredit his statement.
What are the possible solutions to this scenario? Describe the outcomes that would provide a win-win situation.
Please be sure to validate your opinions and ideas with citations and references in APA format.
The post and responses are valued at 40 points. Please review post and response expectations. Please review the rubric to ensure that your response meets criteria.
Estimated time to complete: 2 hours
Peer Responses: Unit 6, Due Sunday by 11:59 pm CT
Palliative Care
Instructions:
Please post 2 peer responses.
In the response post, include the following:
Review your classmate’s assessment of questions 1, 2, and 3. Offer feedback (opposing views are welcomed and respected).
Summarize and cite one source that either supports or provides contrast to your classmate’s post. This source should focus on the legal or ethical aspect of the case (or both, if desired).
Please be sure to validate your opinions and ideas with citations and references in APA format.
Delivering a high-quality product at a reasonable price is not enough anymore.
That’s why we have developed 5 beneficial guarantees that will make your experience with our service enjoyable, easy, and safe.
You have to be 100% sure of the quality of your product to give a money-back guarantee. This describes us perfectly. Make sure that this guarantee is totally transparent.
Read moreEach paper is composed from scratch, according to your instructions. It is then checked by our plagiarism-detection software. There is no gap where plagiarism could squeeze in.
Read moreThanks to our free revisions, there is no way for you to be unsatisfied. We will work on your paper until you are completely happy with the result.
Read moreYour email is safe, as we store it according to international data protection rules. Your bank details are secure, as we use only reliable payment systems.
Read moreBy sending us your money, you buy the service we provide. Check out our terms and conditions if you prefer business talks to be laid out in official language.
Read more