Points: 240
Assignment 1: Prioritizing Projects at D. D. Williamson (Chapter 2)
Criteria
Unacceptable
Below 70% F
Fair
70-79% C
Proficient
80-89% B
Exemplary
90-100% A
1. Analyze the prioritizing process at D. D. Williamson.
Weight: 20%
Did not submit or incompletely critiqued the prioritizing process at D. D. Williamson.
Partially critiqued the prioritizing process at D. D. Williamson.
Satisfactorily critiqued the prioritizing process at D. D. Williamson.
Thoroughly critiqued the prioritizing process at D. D. Williamson.
2. Suggest two (2) recommendation to improve the prioritizing process.
Weight: 20%
Did not submit or incompletely suggested two (2) recommendations to improve the prioritizing process.
Partially suggested two (2) recommendations to improve the prioritizing process.
Satisfactorily suggested two (2) recommendations to improve the prioritizing process.
Thoroughly suggested two (2) recommendations to improve the prioritizing process.
3. Create a scenario where the implemented process at D. D. Williamson would not work.
Weight: 20%
Did not submit or incompletely created a scenario where the implemented process at D. D. Williamson would not work.
Partially created a scenario where the implemented process at D. D. Williamson would not work.
Satisfactorily created a scenario where the implemented process at D. D. Williamson would not work.
Thoroughly created a scenario where the implemented process at D. D. Williamson would not work.
4. Project five (5) years ahead and speculate whether or not D. D. Williamson will be using the same process. Justify your answer.
Weight: 25%
Did not submit or incompletely projected five (5) years ahead. Did not submit or incompletely speculated whether or not D. D. Williamson will be using the same process.
Partially projected five (5) years ahead. Partially speculated whether or not D. D. Williamson will be using the same process.
Satisfactorily projected five (5) years ahead. Satisfactorily speculated whether or not D. D. Williamson will be using the same process.
Thoroughly projected five (5) years ahead. Thoroughly speculated whether or not D. D. Williamson will be using the same process.
5. Four (4) References
Weight: 5%
Does not meet the required number of references; some or all references poor quality choices.
Meets number of required references; all references high quality choices.
Exceeds number of required references; all references high quality choices.
6. Clarity and writing mechanics
Weight: 10%
More than 6 errors present
5-6 errors present
3-4 errors present
0-2 errors present
Delivering a high-quality product at a reasonable price is not enough anymore.
That’s why we have developed 5 beneficial guarantees that will make your experience with our service enjoyable, easy, and safe.
You have to be 100% sure of the quality of your product to give a money-back guarantee. This describes us perfectly. Make sure that this guarantee is totally transparent.
Read moreEach paper is composed from scratch, according to your instructions. It is then checked by our plagiarism-detection software. There is no gap where plagiarism could squeeze in.
Read moreThanks to our free revisions, there is no way for you to be unsatisfied. We will work on your paper until you are completely happy with the result.
Read moreYour email is safe, as we store it according to international data protection rules. Your bank details are secure, as we use only reliable payment systems.
Read moreBy sending us your money, you buy the service we provide. Check out our terms and conditions if you prefer business talks to be laid out in official language.
Read more
Recent Comments