The internet is one of the most powerful tools that can easily be accessed by any individual so as long as he has a modem, a telephone and a computer. It is the best instrument to educate and enlighten one’s mind due to the many views and theories it has compiled in its infinite database.
Yet, this is not the reason why the Chinese Government is advocating the internet. According to Hermida (2002), China only sees two objectives for the internet—the first being for economic improvement. The second objective is to regulate public sentiments to share the same views as the government. It is because of the second primary objective that has made the Chinese Government ban or censor sites from being viewed by the general public.
What makes it worse is conglomerates, offering software and hardware, are in cohorts with China’s policy. According to Jessup and Valacich (n.d.), Cisco, Microsoft and Google agreed to censor information that does not coincide with the government’s communication plan. This becomes an ethical problem because of two things according to Jessup and Valacich (n.d.).
For one, this goes against the Universal Declaration of Human Rights of the United Nations. The United Nations in Article 19 proclaims that all individuals have the right to freedom of speech—articulation of opinions and ideas, without having to face discrimination from any party. Second, the Chinese government does not have the right to ban sites and censor information because they do not own the information posted on the web.
The dissemination of knowledge should be allowed for all and not be curtailed by the government or any organization. Ethical standards dictate that knowledge and education should be free for all, whether rich or poor, Chinese or American. Individuals have a right to know the truth by hearing and reading different views, which can be sourced from the internet. There must be external help outside of China to help rectify the situation. Cisco, Microsoft and Google should not adhere to China’s instructions over a quick buck. They should submit to stand their ground and follow universal ethical norms.
REFERENCES
Hermida, A. (2002, September 3, 2002). BBC – Technology – Behind China’s Internet Red Firewall. BBC – Homepage. Retrieved June 22, 2009, from http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/technology/2234154.stm.
The Universal Declaration of Human Rights (n.d.). United Nations – Homepage. Retrieved June 22, 2009, from http://www.un.org/en/documents/udhr/index.shtml#a19.
Jessup, L and Valacich, J (n.d.). Online Not Always Universal – Information Systems Today, Managing in the Digital World, Third Edition. Course Smart Reader – Homepage. Retrieved June 22, 2009, from http://www.coursesmart.com/0132335077/9?imagepage=9.
Delivering a high-quality product at a reasonable price is not enough anymore.
That’s why we have developed 5 beneficial guarantees that will make your experience with our service enjoyable, easy, and safe.
You have to be 100% sure of the quality of your product to give a money-back guarantee. This describes us perfectly. Make sure that this guarantee is totally transparent.
Read moreEach paper is composed from scratch, according to your instructions. It is then checked by our plagiarism-detection software. There is no gap where plagiarism could squeeze in.
Read moreThanks to our free revisions, there is no way for you to be unsatisfied. We will work on your paper until you are completely happy with the result.
Read moreYour email is safe, as we store it according to international data protection rules. Your bank details are secure, as we use only reliable payment systems.
Read moreBy sending us your money, you buy the service we provide. Check out our terms and conditions if you prefer business talks to be laid out in official language.
Read more