Crit 2

Use the following Harvard Business Review case study for this Critical Thinking assignment:

Christensen, C.M., & Raynor, M.E. (2003). Why hard-nosed executives should care about management theory. Harvard Business Case Study. Retrieved from https://hbsp.harvard.edu/tu/b2f55837

For this assignment, you serve as a business analyst for a company (real or fictitious) in an industry of your choice. Begin by reading the given case study, and then develop a high-level summary of the case. In addition to this, your paper should include the following:

Managers and executives with a problem may tend to quickly move to solving the problem rather than taking the time to clearly understand, or even identify, the problem: Which management theory supports this action? Which management theory does not support this action?
As a business analyst, how can managers and executives distinguish a good management theory from a bad one?
Describe how stakeholder relationships could influence executive behavior and provide one example of how stakeholder relationships contributed to improved performance of either the organization or people within the organization.

Your well-written paper should meet the following requirements:

Be four to six pages in length.
Be formatted according to APA. 
Include at least four to six scholarly or peer-reviewed articles. The Library is a good place to find these resources.
Include a title page, section headers, introduction, conclusion, and references page.