18 (7.2%) – 20 (8%)
Provided a fully developed overview of the assignment and its purpose with insightful analysis of concepts and related issues.
16 (6.4%) – 17 (6.8%)
Provided a developed overview of the assignment and its purpose with reasonable analysis of concepts and related issues.
14 (5.6%) – 15 (6%)
Provided a minimally-developed overview of the assignment and its purpose with limited analysis of concepts and related issues.
0 (0%) – 13 (5.2%)
Provided a under-developed overview of the assignment and its purpose with little or no analysis of concepts and related issues.
36 (14.4%) – 40 (16%)
Provided a fully developed analysis of the dashboard data focused on needs for improvement and statistical findings with insightful analysis of concepts and related issues.
32 (12.8%) – 35 (14%)
Provided a developed analysis of the dashboard data focused on needs for improvement and statistical findings with reasonable analysis of concepts and related issues.
28 (11.2%) – 31 (12.4%)
Provided a minimally-developed analysis of the dashboard data focused on needs for improvement and statistical findings with limited analysis of concepts and related issues.
0 (0%) – 27 (10.8%)
Provided a under-developed analysis of the dashboard data focused on needs for improvement and statistical findings with little or no analysis of concepts and related issues.
108 (43.2%) – 120 (48%)
Provided a fully developed nursing plan on three or more best practices to improve performance with insightful analysis of concepts and related issues
96 (38.4%) – 107 (42.8%)
Provided a developed nursing plan on three or more best practices to improve performance with reasonable analysis of concepts and related issues.
84 (33.6%) – 95 (38%)
Provided a minimally-developed nursing plan on three or more best practices to improve performance with limited analysis of concepts and related issues.
0 (0%) – 83 (33.2%)
Provided a under-developed nursing plan on three or more best practices to improve performancewith little or no analysis of concepts and related issues.
18 (7.2%) – 20 (8%)
Provided a fully developed summary of the main points with insightful analysis of concepts and related issues.
16 (6.4%) – 17 (6.8%)
Provided a developed summary of the main points with reasonable analysis of concepts and related issues.
14 (5.6%) – 15 (6%)
Provided a minimally-developed summary of the main points with limited analysis of concepts and related issues.
0 (0%) – 13 (5.2%)
Provided a under-developed summary of the main points with little or no analysis of concepts and related issues.
23 (9.2%) – 25 (10%)
Demonstrates fully developed sentence, paragraph, and essay level skills. Displays academic expression through fully developed use of evidence from multiple sources to support content. Meets the 4000 AWE level with no writing issues and exceeds the minimum reference requirement.
20 (8%) – 22 (8.8%)
Demonstrates developed sentence, paragraph, and essay level skills. Displays academic expression through developed use of evidence from most sources to support content. Meets the 4000 AWE level with minimal writing issues and exceeds the minimum reference requirement.
18 (7.2%) – 19 (7.6%)
Demonstrates minimally developed sentence, paragraph, and essay level skills. Beginning to display academic expression through minimally developed use of evidence from some sources to support content. Minimally meets the 4000 AWE level with several writing issues and meets the minimum reference requirement.
0 (0%) – 17 (6.8%)
Demonstrates limited sentence, paragraph, and essay level skills. Does not display academic expression, has limited use of evidence with few or no sources to support the content. Does not meet the 4000 AWE level of writing and does not meet the mimium reference requirement.
23 (9.2%) – 25 (10%)
Demonstrates fully developed APA formatting and referencing requirements with no formatting errors.
20 (8%) – 22 (8.8%)
Demonstrates developed APA formatting and referencing requirements with minimal formatting errors.
18 (7.2%) – 19 (7.6%)
Demonstrates minimally developed APA formatting and referencing requirements with several formatting errors.
0 (0%) – 17 (6.8%)
Demonstrates limited APA formatting and referencing requirements with multiple formatting errors.
Delivering a high-quality product at a reasonable price is not enough anymore.
That’s why we have developed 5 beneficial guarantees that will make your experience with our service enjoyable, easy, and safe.
You have to be 100% sure of the quality of your product to give a money-back guarantee. This describes us perfectly. Make sure that this guarantee is totally transparent.
Read moreEach paper is composed from scratch, according to your instructions. It is then checked by our plagiarism-detection software. There is no gap where plagiarism could squeeze in.
Read moreThanks to our free revisions, there is no way for you to be unsatisfied. We will work on your paper until you are completely happy with the result.
Read moreYour email is safe, as we store it according to international data protection rules. Your bank details are secure, as we use only reliable payment systems.
Read moreBy sending us your money, you buy the service we provide. Check out our terms and conditions if you prefer business talks to be laid out in official language.
Read more