Post an explanation of how the use of CBT in groups compares to its use in family settings. Provide specific examples from your own practicum experiences. Then, explain at least two challenges counselors might encounter when using CBT in the group setting. Support your response with specific examples from this week’s media. 

Rubric:

Main Posting: Response to the discusion question is reflecive with critical analysis and synthesis representive of knowledg gained from the course readings for the module and current credible sources.–

Outstanding Performance 44 (44%) – 44 (44%)Excellent Performance 40 (40%) – 43 (43%)Competent Performance 35 (35%) – 39 (39%)Proficient Performance 31 (31%) – 34 (34%)Room for Improvement 0 (0%) – 30 (30%)

Main Posting: Writing–

Outstanding Performance 6 (6%) – 6 (6%)Excellent Performance 5.5 (5.5%) – 5.5 (5.5%)Competent Performance 5 (5%) – 5 (5%)Proficient Performance 4.5 (4.5%) – 4.5 (4.5%)Room for Improvement 0 (0%) – 4 (4%)

Main Posting: Timely and full participation–

Outstanding Performance 10 (10%) – 10 (10%)Excellent Performance 0 (0%) – 0 (0%)Competent Performance 0 (0%) – 0 (0%)Proficient Performance 0 (0%) – 0 (0%)Room for Improvement 0 (0%) – 6 (6%)

First Reponse

Post to colleague’s main post that is reflective and justified with credible sources.–

Outstanding Performance 9 (9%) – 9 (9%)Excellent Performance 8.5 (8.5%) – 8.5 (8.5%)Competent Performance 7.5 (7.5%) – 8 (8%)Proficient Performance 6.5 (6.5%) – 7 (7%)Room for Improvement 0 (0%) – 6 (6%)

First Reponse: Writing–

Outstanding Performance 6 (6%) – 6 (6%)Excellent Performance 5.5 (5.5%) – 5.5 (5.5%)Competent Performance 5 (5%) – 5 (5%)Proficient Performance 4.5 (4.5%) – 4.5 (4.5%)Room for Improvement 0 (0%) – 4 (4%)

First Reponse: Timely and full participation–

Outstanding Performance 5 (5%) – 5 (5%)Excellent Performance 0 (0%) – 0 (0%)Competent Performance 0 (0%) – 0 (0%)Proficient Performance 0 (0%) – 0 (0%)Room for Improvement 0 (0%) – 4 (4%)

Second Reponse: Post to colleague’s main post that is reflective and justified with credible sources.–

Outstanding Performance 9 (9%) – 9 (9%)Excellent Performance 8.5 (8.5%) – 8.5 (8.5%)Competent Performance 7.5 (7.5%) – 8 (8%)Proficient Performance 6.5 (6.5%) – 7 (7%)Room for Improvement 0 (0%) – 6 (6%)

Second Reponse: Writing–

Outstanding Performance 6 (6%) – 6 (6%)Excellent Performance 5.5 (5.5%) – 5.5 (5.5%)Competent Performance 5 (5%) – 5 (5%)Proficient Performance 4.5 (4.5%) – 4.5 (4.5%)Room for Improvement 0 (0%) – 4 (4%)

Second Reponse: Timely and full participation–

Outstanding Performance 5 (5%) – 5 (5%)Excellent Performance 0 (0%) – 0 (0%)Competent Performance 0 (0%) – 0 (0%)Proficient Performance 0 (0%) – 0 (0%)Room for Improvement 0 (0%) – 0 (0%)