discussion boad due thursday…. make sure you read my case study below this…
case study…….
In 2013 the woman was diagnosed with endometrial hyperplasia after the tests ordered by Gayed. The disease is an overgrowth of the uterine lining which is a signal of cancer. The doctor then performed endometrial ablation. The operations are reportedly negative since it destroys all the uterus layers. After five years, the woman returned to the hospital and was diagnosed with uterus cancer. According to health reports, it is unprofessional to perform ablation on hyperplasia women. The procedure increases the chances of cancerous cells development which leads to cancer (Davey, 2018).
discussion board assignment
Health care organizations, by their nature, must constantly strive to improve patient care. Many different approaches to improvement have been utilized over the years. In this discussion, you critically evaluate a number of these historical and contemporary approaches and consider what is most effective. You then apply those approaches to your case study, and analyze the effect they might have had on the outcome of that case.
To prepare for this Discussion, complete the readings in your Learning Resources.
Post a description of two historical and/or contemporary approaches to quality improvement you feel would be most effective to improve health care quality and safety. Then, evaluate how these approaches could be applied to the case study you identified in Week 1. Finally, analyze how adapting these approaches might have altered the outcome in that case study.
Support your work with specific citations from this week’s Learning Resources and/or additional sources, as appropriate. Your citations must be in APA format. Refer to the Essential Guide to APA Style for Walden Students to ensure your in-text citations and reference list are correct.
_____________________________
resources
Introduction to healthcare quality management
Chapter 5, “Continuous Improvement”
Chapter 6, “Performance Improvement Tools”
Day, S., Dalto, J, Fox, J., Turpin, M. (2006, Jul-Sept). Failure mode and effects analysis as a performance improvement tool in trauma. Journal of Trauma Nursing 13 (3), 111-117.
Grol, R. (2001). Improving the quality of medical care: Building bridges among professional pride, payer profit, and patient satisfaction. JAMA: The Journal of the American Medical Association, 286(20), 2578–2585.
Note: Retrieved from Walden Library databases.
Improving the quality of medical care: building bridges among professional pride, payer profit, and patient satisfaction. JAMA: The Journal Of The American Medical Association, 286(20) by Grol, R. Copyright 2001 by the AMERICAN MEDICAL ASSOCIATION. Reprinted by permission of AMERICAN MEDICAL ASSOCIATION via the Copyright Clearance Center.
Introduction to continuous quality improvement techniques for healthcare process improvement. (2007). Statit Software, Inc. Retrieved from http://www.statit.com/services/CQIOverview.pdf
Read pages 4–20 and page 37. Review the charts and appendices available, as you deem necessary.
Introduction To Continuous Quality Improvement Techniques For Healthcare Process Improvement (2007). Copyright 2007 by Statit Software, Inc. Reprinted by permission.
American Academy of Family Physicians. (2011). Quality improvement (QI) tools & resources. Retrieved from http://www.aafp.org/online/en/home/practicemgt/quality/qitools.htm
Institute for Healthcare Improvement. (n.d.) Getting Started Guide: Improving Care for Patients with Heart Failure — Focus on Ambulatory Care. Retrieved from http://www.ihi.org/knowledge/Pages/Tools/GettingStartedGuideImprovingCareHeartFailureAmbulatoryCare.aspx/
Institute for Healthcare Improvement. (n.d.) How to improve, improvement methods. Retrieved from http://www.ihi.org/IHI/Topics/Improvement/ImprovementMethods/HowToImprove/
Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality. (2005, March). Fact sheet (AHRQ Publication No. 05-P016). In Tools for Hospitals and Health Care Systems. Rockville, MD: Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality. Retrieved from http://www.ahrq.gov/qual/hosptools.htm
Health Research & Educational Trust in Partnership in partnership with AHA (HRET): Short Descriptions of AHRQ Patient Safety Tools http://www.hret.org/quality/projects/ahrqpstools.shtml
The Joint Commission.(n.d.). Patient safety videos [Online video]. Retrieved from http://www.jcrinc.com/Patient-Safety-Videos/
Delivering a high-quality product at a reasonable price is not enough anymore.
That’s why we have developed 5 beneficial guarantees that will make your experience with our service enjoyable, easy, and safe.
You have to be 100% sure of the quality of your product to give a money-back guarantee. This describes us perfectly. Make sure that this guarantee is totally transparent.
Read moreEach paper is composed from scratch, according to your instructions. It is then checked by our plagiarism-detection software. There is no gap where plagiarism could squeeze in.
Read moreThanks to our free revisions, there is no way for you to be unsatisfied. We will work on your paper until you are completely happy with the result.
Read moreYour email is safe, as we store it according to international data protection rules. Your bank details are secure, as we use only reliable payment systems.
Read moreBy sending us your money, you buy the service we provide. Check out our terms and conditions if you prefer business talks to be laid out in official language.
Read more