Assignment 1: Conflict Management
So far, you have completed self-assessment and evaluations to discover your own preferences, behaviors, and strengths and weaknesses related to conflict management. You have completed work on various case studies and scenarios, and you have also created a working model for conflict resolution. For this discussion assignment, complete the following tasks:
This assignment will provide you with practice in reflexivity—a term taken from qualitative research. It involves identifying one’s position and voice when answering “What do I know?” and “How do I know it?” This process requires honest descriptions and appraisals of a person’s values and perspectives in an ongoing experience with his or her ideas and/or actions. This process allows the writer to use rich descriptions, meaningful sequencing, selected quotes, and elaborations on keen insight being experienced. The individual, being reflective, writes in first person, active voice. Description and interpretation are expected to happen. At the same time, a person’s recognition of his or her bias or particular stance to a set of ideas must be included. Quality, rather than quantity, of work is expected.
Submission Details:
| Assignment 1 Grading Criteria |
Maximum Points |
| Response Criteria | |
| Provided an in-depth explanation or analysis of the subject or the topic. |
8 |
| Used a clear, logical, and organized line of reasoning. |
4 |
| Provided adequate justification and evidence supporting the opinion expressed. |
4 |
| Submitted on time. |
4 |
| Participation Criteria | |
| Participated in the discussion by asking a question, providing a statement of clarification, providing a point of view with a rationale, challenging a point of the discussion, or making a relationship between two or more points of the discussion. |
4 |
| Used appropriate tone and language given the scholarly atmosphere and diverse learning culture. |
4 |
| Responded to the posts of at least two classmates with meaningful and relevant responses that add value to the original post or the discussion. Offered criticism that was respectful of the other person’s feelings. |
4 |
| Style and Formatting | |
| Justified ideas and responses by using appropriate examples and references from texts, peer reviewed journal articles, along with other references or personal experience. |
4 |
| Wrote in a clear, concise, and organized manner; demonstrated ethical scholarship in accurate representation and attribution of sources; and displayed accurate spelling, grammar, and punctuation. |
4 |
| Total: |
40 |
Delivering a high-quality product at a reasonable price is not enough anymore.
That’s why we have developed 5 beneficial guarantees that will make your experience with our service enjoyable, easy, and safe.
You have to be 100% sure of the quality of your product to give a money-back guarantee. This describes us perfectly. Make sure that this guarantee is totally transparent.
Read moreEach paper is composed from scratch, according to your instructions. It is then checked by our plagiarism-detection software. There is no gap where plagiarism could squeeze in.
Read moreThanks to our free revisions, there is no way for you to be unsatisfied. We will work on your paper until you are completely happy with the result.
Read moreYour email is safe, as we store it according to international data protection rules. Your bank details are secure, as we use only reliable payment systems.
Read moreBy sending us your money, you buy the service we provide. Check out our terms and conditions if you prefer business talks to be laid out in official language.
Read more