Criteria |
Developing |
Competent |
Exemplary |
Weight |
Internal and External Stakeholders Identified |
Stakeholders and/or roles are not clearly identified. |
Most stakeholders and their roles are identified near beginning or at some point in the paper. |
All stakeholders and their roles are clearly identified early in paper. |
1 |
Reasons in support of the claim
|
Most reasons are weak or not stated. Insufficient support for claim, articulating few or no positive or negative influences on stakeholders. |
Most reasons are strong. Sufficient support for claim, articulating some positive or negative influences on stakeholders. |
All reasons are strong. Solid support for claim, articulating important positive or negative influences on stakeholders.
|
3 |
Reasons against the claim
|
Alternative viewpoints identified insufficiently or not at all. Most important strengths and weaknesses in comparison to claim not identified. Counter argument to alternatives not stated or developed insufficiently and does not show that the paper’s claim is still valid. |
Alternative viewpoints identified sufficiently. Most important strengths and weaknesses in comparison to claim addressed. Counter argument to alternatives developed sufficiently and shows that paper’s claim is still valid.
|
Alternative viewpoints identified very clearly. All important strengths and weaknesses in comparison to claim fully addressed. Counter argument to alternatives developed fully and shows that the paper’s claim is still valid.
|
3 |
Organization and Clarity |
Insufficient organization with little or no introduction, few or no transitions; insufficient conclusion. |
Sufficient organization with clear introduction; some transitions, conclusion.
|
Solid organization with strong introduction, helpful transitions, effective conclusion.
|
1 |
Writing – Grammar, spelling, punctuation
|
Sentence / paragraph structure, spelling, and punctuation (6 + different errors: Many issues)
|
Sentence / paragraph structure, spelling, and punctuation (4 – 5 different errors: Minor issues) |
Sentences / paragraph structure, spelling, and punctuation (0 – 3 different errors) |
1 |
APA |
Insufficient application of APA conventions: Title page, font and spacing, pagination, in text citations, and reference page. (6 + different errors; significant issues with APA application)
|
Sufficient application of APA conventions: Title page, font and spacing, pagination, in text citations, and reference page. (4 – 5 different errors; minor issues with APA)
|
Exemplary application of APA conventions: Title page, font and spacing, pagination, in text citations, and reference page. (0 – 3 different errors |
1 |
Delivering a high-quality product at a reasonable price is not enough anymore.
That’s why we have developed 5 beneficial guarantees that will make your experience with our service enjoyable, easy, and safe.
You have to be 100% sure of the quality of your product to give a money-back guarantee. This describes us perfectly. Make sure that this guarantee is totally transparent.
Read moreEach paper is composed from scratch, according to your instructions. It is then checked by our plagiarism-detection software. There is no gap where plagiarism could squeeze in.
Read moreThanks to our free revisions, there is no way for you to be unsatisfied. We will work on your paper until you are completely happy with the result.
Read moreYour email is safe, as we store it according to international data protection rules. Your bank details are secure, as we use only reliable payment systems.
Read moreBy sending us your money, you buy the service we provide. Check out our terms and conditions if you prefer business talks to be laid out in official language.
Read more