In 1972 the U.S. Supreme Court ruled in Neil v. Biggers and outlined five criteria that should be used in evaluating the accuracy of eyewitness identifications: 1) the witness’s certainty, 2) their quality of view, 3) the amount of attention paid to the culprit, 4) the agreement between the witness’s description and the suspect, and 5) the amount of time between the crime and the identification attempt. The criteria that have been set allow various factors into play, factors that would possibly influence visual perceptual experiences in eyewitness testimonies. Various issues come to play as ruled in the Neil v. Biggers case; illumination, duress, distances, and emotions.
Delivering a high-quality product at a reasonable price is not enough anymore.
That’s why we have developed 5 beneficial guarantees that will make your experience with our service enjoyable, easy, and safe.
You have to be 100% sure of the quality of your product to give a money-back guarantee. This describes us perfectly. Make sure that this guarantee is totally transparent.
Read moreEach paper is composed from scratch, according to your instructions. It is then checked by our plagiarism-detection software. There is no gap where plagiarism could squeeze in.
Read moreThanks to our free revisions, there is no way for you to be unsatisfied. We will work on your paper until you are completely happy with the result.
Read moreYour email is safe, as we store it according to international data protection rules. Your bank details are secure, as we use only reliable payment systems.
Read moreBy sending us your money, you buy the service we provide. Check out our terms and conditions if you prefer business talks to be laid out in official language.
Read more