The Myers-Briggs Type Indicator (MBTI) is one of the most popular personality tests in the world today. However, data reviewed from more than twenty MBTI research studies has indicated that the test has inadequate validity. In other words, MBTI does not adequately measure what it is meant to measure. Moreover, MBTI has reported reliability coefficients for its four scales on general population samples in the ranges from 0.61 to 0.87. Experts on psychometric testing reveal that reliability coefficients for short personality tests should actually be in the range of 0.7 to 0.8 (Psychometric Success).
Does this mean that MBTI is unreliable? – No. While this important personality test sometimes reveals a lower reliability coefficient than the other personality tests, even when its reliability coefficient is close to 0.61, the test is said to give us a dependable measure of the constructs it measures at least 61% of the time. To put it another way, at least 61% of the people who use the MBTI once would see that their scores on the different constructs of the test would not change on a second testing session and all subsequent testing sessions.
Reliability is also known as “repeatability” or “consistency.” A test with perfect reliability has a coefficient of 1.0. A test with no reliability whatsoever has a coefficient of 0. A test with perfect reliability is one which gives us absolutely consistent results with the same sample. The higher the reliability, the better is a test, scientifically, given that we can trust the results of this test with confidence, knowing that they will not change drastically through retesting (Trochim, 2006).
With MBTI, we can be confident that the test would show us a true picture of an individual’s personality at least 61% of the time. Although this value is better than 50%, MBTI would have given us greater confidence in terms of its measurement if its reliability coefficient always fell in the range of 0.8 to 0.9. This would have led us to believe that MBTI is most definitely a trustworthy measure of an individual’s personality type.
References
1.Psychometric Success. “Myers-Briggs Widely Used But Still Controversial.” Available at http://www.psychometric-success.com/index.htm. (31 January 2007).
2. Trochim, William. (2006). “Theory of Reliability.” Research Methods Knowledge Base. Available at http://www.socialresearchmethods.net/kb/reliablt.php. (31 January 2007).
Delivering a high-quality product at a reasonable price is not enough anymore.
That’s why we have developed 5 beneficial guarantees that will make your experience with our service enjoyable, easy, and safe.
You have to be 100% sure of the quality of your product to give a money-back guarantee. This describes us perfectly. Make sure that this guarantee is totally transparent.
Read moreEach paper is composed from scratch, according to your instructions. It is then checked by our plagiarism-detection software. There is no gap where plagiarism could squeeze in.
Read moreThanks to our free revisions, there is no way for you to be unsatisfied. We will work on your paper until you are completely happy with the result.
Read moreYour email is safe, as we store it according to international data protection rules. Your bank details are secure, as we use only reliable payment systems.
Read moreBy sending us your money, you buy the service we provide. Check out our terms and conditions if you prefer business talks to be laid out in official language.
Read more