Category
Points
%
Description
Application of Course Knowledge:
15
30
Answers the initial discussion question(s)/topic(s), demonstrating knowledge and understanding of the concepts for the week.
Engagement in Meaningful Dialogue With Peers and Faculty
10
20
Responds to a student peer AND course faculty furthering the dialogue by providing more information and clarification, adding depth to the conversation
Integration of Evidence
15
30
Assigned readings OR online lesson AND at least one outside scholarly source are included. The scholarly source is:
1) evidence-based, 2) scholarly in nature, 3) published within the last 5 years
40
80%
Total CONTENT Points= 40 pts
DISCUSSION FORMAT
Category
Points
%
Description
Grammar and Communication
5
10
Presents information using clear and concise language in an organized manner
Reference Citation
5
10
References have complete information as required by APA
In-text citations included for all references AND references included for all in-text citation
10
20%
Total FORMAT Points= 10 pts
DISCUSSION TOTAL= 50 points
Nursing knowledge is classified in a variety of ways, one of which is Carper’s Patterns of Knowing (Carper, 1978). Carper’s framework offers a lens through which the nurse can reflect upon insights acquired through empirical, ethical, personal, and aesthetic knowledge (Carper, 1978). Through intentional reflection using Carper’s Patterns of Knowing, nurses can process experiential learning and knowledge acquired through practice. The purpose of this assignment is to reflect upon a specific practice situation and better understand the professional knowledge and insights obtained through that experience.
Criteria for Content
References to use:
Butts, B. J. & Rich, L. K. (2018). Philosophies and theories for advanced nursing practice (3rd ed.). Burlington, MA: Jones & Bartlett Learning. Chapters 5, 7
Carper, A. B. (1978). Fundamental patterns of knowing in nursing. Advances in Nursing Science, 38, 13-24.
Fawcett, J., & Cody, W. (1996). Scholarly dialogue. On the requirements for a metaparadigm: An invitation to dialogue. Nursing Science Quarterly, 9(3), 94-106.
Recommended:
Eisenhauer, R. E. (2015). An interview with Dr. Barbara A. Carper. Advances in Nursing Science, 38(2). 73-82.
Im, E.O. (2015). The current status of theory evaluation in nursing. Journal of Advanced Nursing, 71(10). 2268-2278.
Delivering a high-quality product at a reasonable price is not enough anymore.
That’s why we have developed 5 beneficial guarantees that will make your experience with our service enjoyable, easy, and safe.
You have to be 100% sure of the quality of your product to give a money-back guarantee. This describes us perfectly. Make sure that this guarantee is totally transparent.
Read moreEach paper is composed from scratch, according to your instructions. It is then checked by our plagiarism-detection software. There is no gap where plagiarism could squeeze in.
Read moreThanks to our free revisions, there is no way for you to be unsatisfied. We will work on your paper until you are completely happy with the result.
Read moreYour email is safe, as we store it according to international data protection rules. Your bank details are secure, as we use only reliable payment systems.
Read moreBy sending us your money, you buy the service we provide. Check out our terms and conditions if you prefer business talks to be laid out in official language.
Read more