Physics

PHYS 102 Module 1 Experiment Report
PHYS 102 Module 1 Experiment Report
CriteriaRatingsPts
This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeNameYour name must be included in the report. There will be a 10% reduction in your grade for this activity if your name is not included.

0.0 ptsMet

0.0 ptsNot Met
10% Reduction
0.0 pts

This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeTitleThe title must be included in the report. There will be a 10% reduction in your grade for this activity if the title is not included.

0.0 ptsMet

0.0 ptsNot Met
10% Reduction
0.0 pts

This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeHypothesis15 pts – Statement that the experiment is going to test, prove, or disprove. What is the point of the experiment? (Make a statement that the experiment will either prove or disprove.) Appropriately and clearly addresses the experiment topic. Note: Posts containing plagiarized work will receive no credit.

15.0 ptsExcellent
13.5 – 15 pts
13.4 ptsGood
11.3 – 13.4 pts
11.2 ptsPoor
0 – 11.2 pts
15.0 pts

This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeOverview20 pts – Brief summary of what occurred in the experiment or what was tested and how: Note: Posts containing plagiarized work will receive no credit.

20.0 ptsExcellent
18 – 20 pts
17.9 ptsGood
15 – 17.9 pts
14.9 ptsPoor
0 – 14.9 pts
20.0 pts

This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeUncertainty and Error10 pts – Can you trust your data? 1) What factors may have affected or biased the data and introduced uncertainty in the lab measurements? Or, what conditions created uncertainty in your measurements? Which measurements were most affected?” 2) If you were conducting the lab in a physical environment, what other factors would have to be taken into account while accomplishing the procedures? How might they affect the data and/or experiment outcome? NOTE: Posts containing plagiarized work will receive no credit.

10.0 ptsExcellent
9 – 10 pts
8.9 ptsGood
7.5 – 8.9 pts
7.4 ptsPoor
0 – 7.4 pts
10.0 pts

This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeConclusion/Summary30 pts – Contains the following components in a flowing narrative: 1) What was done. 2) How it was done (brief description). 3) What was learned. 4) Possible errors/flaws (at least one). 5) Suggestions for improvement in experiment. NOTE: Posts containing plagiarized work will receive no credit.

30.0 ptsExcellent
27 – 30 pts
26.9 ptsGood
22.5 – 26.9 pts
22.4 ptsPoor
0 – 22.4 pts
30.0 pts

This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeApplication10 pts – How does this topic—and science in general—impact our understanding of the complex, technological society of which we are a part? How does this explain something in the real world around you?

10.0 ptsExcellent
9 – 10 pts
8.9 ptsGood
7.5 – 8.9 pts
7.4 ptsPoor
0 – 7.4 pts
10.0 pts

This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeMechanics15 pts – Writing is grammatically-sound and free of spelling, punctuation or word usage errors; includes proper APA format on citations/ references.

15.0 ptsExcellent
13.5 – 15 pts
13.4 ptsGood
11.3 – 13.4 pts
11.2 ptsPoor
0 – 11.2 pts
15.0 pts

This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeTimelinessThe Experiment Report was submitted by the end of the fifth day of the module week, as recommended. There will be a 2% bonus for compliance.

0.0 ptsMet

0.0 ptsNot Met

0.0 pts

Total Points: 100.0