The non-fictional music review is aimed at audiences of all ages, mostly to the public who are contemplating buying or listening to the album. Although the foundation of this review is referential, it grows into more of an expressive and opinionated description of the tracks. There is an informal, planned and context bound structure, which will possess semi-permanence, as although it will be saved on the Internet, it does not contain enough importance to be around permanently.
The introducing paragraph with a simile attached to a metaphor to portray the band’s history – “chucked back and forth between critics like a piece of bait between angry dogs”. This gives a sense of the band having a rollercoaster-ride time in the media and instantly gives interest as to why this band has had so much attention.
The adjacency pair of a rhetorical question “and what do they have to say…?” and an answer “This album” is resembling the reader’s questioning thoughts to the previous statement and turns the subject from the band’s past to the present. A description of adjectives and noun phrases follows – “filled with argumentative lyrics and catchy tunes to fight back to the critics”
The next paragraph is informational with numerical adjectives “20th July 2008”, “300,000”, “2.5 million” and “number 8” to give a factual background for the curious readers. Quoting a member of the band and the producer also interests fans – “Tom Fletcher revealed…”, “Producer Jason Perry describes”
I included an intensifier – which I continuously used to keep interest and keep an elevated description – to give the image of exaggerated annoyance all over Britain and raise the importance of the band: “…beat them in the battle of the charts caused uproar”.
I used repetition on the word “smile” in “…anyone tapping the steering wheel on a gloomy Monday morning to work with a smile on their face” and “the ironically named “Smile”, reminding everyone to “Just remember to smile, smile, smile,”” to represent the sunny attitude. In the former quote, I created a common exemplar situation to give a personal twist to the factual content.
In the conclusion I quickly described their past work with an over-use of adjectives and proper nouns. I started the last paragraph with a concluding recommendation summary with a similar question-answer format to the beginning of the review (“have to say…? This album.” ) – “Contemplating… worth your hard-earned cash, the answer is yes”. The finale statement is then an imperative order, “buy this album”.
Delivering a high-quality product at a reasonable price is not enough anymore.
That’s why we have developed 5 beneficial guarantees that will make your experience with our service enjoyable, easy, and safe.
You have to be 100% sure of the quality of your product to give a money-back guarantee. This describes us perfectly. Make sure that this guarantee is totally transparent.
Read moreEach paper is composed from scratch, according to your instructions. It is then checked by our plagiarism-detection software. There is no gap where plagiarism could squeeze in.
Read moreThanks to our free revisions, there is no way for you to be unsatisfied. We will work on your paper until you are completely happy with the result.
Read moreYour email is safe, as we store it according to international data protection rules. Your bank details are secure, as we use only reliable payment systems.
Read moreBy sending us your money, you buy the service we provide. Check out our terms and conditions if you prefer business talks to be laid out in official language.
Read more