This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeTopical Insight
|
Proficient: Student thoroughly addresses all aspects of the prompt and demonstrates critical thinking by using resources to support their own, unique thoughts. 23.0 pts |
Competent: Student addresses the majority of the prompt. Ideas presented rely heavily on evidence obtained from supporting sources. 14.0 pts |
Novice: Student fails to address the majority of the prompt. Student shows a minimal amount of critical thought and personal conclusions regarding the prompt. 0.0 pts |
23.0 pts
This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeSources & Citations
|
Proficient: Student uses three (3) sources and cites them properly both in the body of the paper (in-text citations) and in the works cited. 19.0 pts |
Competent: Student uses three (3) sources, but does not properly cite them either in-text and/or in the works cited. 11.0 pts |
Novice: Student uses less than three (3) sources. and/or Citations are drastically lacking in accuracy (i.e. student uses only hyperlinks in works cited) 0.0 pts |
19.0 pts
This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeSequence of Ideas
|
Proficient: Reading the essay is easy. The student writes in a manner that allows his/her ideas to flow clearly and effectively from idea to idea. The order of content is logical. 15.0 pts |
Competent: Reading the essay is somewhat challenging. The sequence of ideas needs some adjustment. Some ideas seem “out of place” within the essay, but the overall intent is understood. 9.0 pts |
Novice: Reading the essay is difficult. Ideas are presented with an unclear sequence of thought. Major revision is needed to improve the presentation of ideas. 0.0 pts |
15.0 pts
This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeWriting Mechanics
|
Proficient: No grammar, punctuation, capitalization, or spelling mistakes were found. Student properly formats artwork titles. High academic quality. 10.0 pts |
Competent: Minimal grammar, punctuation, capitalization, or spelling mistakes found. Student forgets to italicize artwork titles. Average academic quality. 6.0 pts |
Novice: Frequent grammar, punctuation, capitalization, or spelling mistakes. Student does not provide artwork titles. Poor academic quality. 0.0 pts |
10.0 pts
This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeLength
|
Proficient: The submitted essay presents three (3) FULL pages of content and takes into consideration space lost by embedded images and/or heading information (in MLA format). 8.0 pts |
Competent: The submitted essay is two (2) or more pages in length, but not quite the required three (3) pages. The student forgot to add length to his/her submission to account for space used by embedded images or formatting requirements. 5.0 pts |
Novice: The submitted essay is noticeably shorter than the required length. Student does not attempt to meet this requirement. 0.0 pts |
8.0 pts
Total Points: 75.0
Delivering a high-quality product at a reasonable price is not enough anymore.
That’s why we have developed 5 beneficial guarantees that will make your experience with our service enjoyable, easy, and safe.
You have to be 100% sure of the quality of your product to give a money-back guarantee. This describes us perfectly. Make sure that this guarantee is totally transparent.
Read moreEach paper is composed from scratch, according to your instructions. It is then checked by our plagiarism-detection software. There is no gap where plagiarism could squeeze in.
Read moreThanks to our free revisions, there is no way for you to be unsatisfied. We will work on your paper until you are completely happy with the result.
Read moreYour email is safe, as we store it according to international data protection rules. Your bank details are secure, as we use only reliable payment systems.
Read moreBy sending us your money, you buy the service we provide. Check out our terms and conditions if you prefer business talks to be laid out in official language.
Read more